Thread: Authenticity of the Pali Canon

  1. #1
    Previous Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    93

    Authenticity of the Pali Canon

    Hi folks, here's an article that I found helpful. Thoughts on this?

    http://www.leighb.com/palisuttas.htm

  2. #2
    Forums Member daverupa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    679
    There are quite a few books on this topic. Here is a storehouse of many of them; the Studies in Early Buddhist Meditation & Early Buddhist Epistemology sections are particularly relevant. Additionally, Sujato has written A History of Mindfulness & Sects & Sectarianism; he & Brahmali also wrote The Authenticity of the Early Buddhist Texts, which is probably the best book to read first.

    The Buddha died ca. 404 BCE, while the Nikayas & Agamas we have both come from a common stock of teachings. These proto-Nikaya-Agamas were scattered throughout northern India when the Buddha died, and they came to be collected & collated together at the Second & Third Councils, probably held ca. 280 BCE & 250 BCE (this is also when they were translated into Pali). A lot happened over those ~150 years, but the specifics are obscure. Usually, talking about this period of time with a Buddhist will reveal what many of their assumptions are about the correct ways to approach these texts.

  3. #3
    Previous Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    93
    Thanks, daverupa!

Los Angeles Mexico City London Colombo Kuala Lumpur Sydney
Sun, 5:16 AM Sun, 7:16 AM Sun, 1:16 PM Sun, 5:46 PM Sun, 8:16 PM Sun, 10:16 PM